Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the submission coupled with the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33.The Sr.Audit Officer (Claims), O/o the Principal Accountant General (G&SSA), 361 Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 018....Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling…
Judgment
W.P.No.23665 of 2012IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 04.03.2024CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASADW.P.No.23665 of 2012 Vadivel...Petitioner-Vs-1.The Principal Accountant General (G&SSA), O/o the Principal Accountant General (G&SSA), 361 Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 018.
The Sr.Deputy Accountant (Administration), O/o the Principal Accountant General (G&SSA), 361 Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 018.
Operative part
The Sr.Audit Officer (Claims), O/o the Principal Accountant General (G&SSA), 361 Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 018....Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in his proceedings No.PC I/Gen/2012-13/51 dated 28.06.2012, to quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to pay the salary every month to the petitioner in cash and to pass such further orders.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23665 of 2012 For Petitioner: Mr.R.MalaichamyFor Respondents: Mr.T.Ravikumar, Standing CounselO R D E RToday, 04.03.2024, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle. 2. In view of the submission coupled with the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 04.03.2024cdaIndex : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non Speaking Order2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23665 of 2012To1.The Principal Accountant General (G&SSA), O/o the Principal Accountant General (G&SSA), 361 Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 018.2.The Sr.Deputy Accountant (Administration), O/o the Principal Accountant General (G&SSA), 361 Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 018.3.The Sr.Audit Officer (Claims), O/o the Principal Accountant General (G&SSA), 361 Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 018.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23665 of 2012 J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.cdaW.P.No.23665 of 201204.03.20244/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the submission coupled with the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.