K. Priya v. M. Kumaran
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made by him in the Court bundle, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Tr.CMP.No.142 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 09.12.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETETr.CMP.No.142 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.2804 of 2025K. Priya ... PetitionerVsM. Kumaran ... RespondentPrayer:- Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the CPC, to withdraw the H.M.O.P.No.140 of 2024 pending on the file of the Sub Court, Uthangari, Krishnagiri district and transfer the same to the V Additional Family Court, Chennai. For Petitioner: Mr.J.Satheesh
Operative part
O R D E RWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.CMP.No.142 of 20252. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made by him in the Court bundle, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 09.12.2025Internet: Yes Index: YesSpeaking Order / Non Speaking OrderdpqTo1. The Sub Court, Uthangari, Krishnagiri district. 2. The V Additional Family Court, Chennai. 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.CMP.No.142 of 2025Dr. A.D. MARIA CLETE , J. dpqTr.CMP.No.142 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.2804 of 202509.12.20253/3
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made by him in the Court bundle, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 24.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.