A.Narayanan v. The State
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Recording the submission of the petitioner (Party-in-person), this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a civil suit before the competent civil court or approach the appropriate authority under the Trade Marks Act,1999
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33.V.Balaji4.R.Veerabadiran [R2 to R4 impleaded vide order 14.06.2023 in Crl.M.P.No.6538 of 2023 in Crl.R.C.No.521 of 2023] ... RespondentsPrayer : Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C, praying to set aside the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Poonamallee, Chennai – 600…
Judgment
Crl.R.C.No.521 of 2023IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.07.2024CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANICrl.R.C.No.521 of 2023A.Narayanan... PetitionerVs.
The State represented by its: Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, EDF I, Avadi Police Commissionerate, Avadi, Chennai – 600 054.
M/s.Balaji Rice Mills, (rep. by its Partner Mr.V.Balaji) No.1, TH Road, Kokkumedu, Ponneri Taluk, Tiruvellore District – 601 204.
Operative part
V.Balaji4.R.Veerabadiran [R2 to R4 impleaded vide order 14.06.2023 in Crl.M.P.No.6538 of 2023 in Crl.R.C.No.521 of 2023] ... RespondentsPrayer : Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C, praying to set aside the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Poonamallee, Chennai – 600 054 made in CMP.No.396 of 2023 dated Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.521 of 202325.01.2023 by allowing this Criminal Revision Petition in accordance with law. For Petitioner: Mr.A.Narayanan (Party-in-Person)For Respondents: Mr.A.GopinathGovernment Advocate (Crl. Side) [R1]*****ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the petitioner (Party-in-Person) sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case. An Endorsement to the said effect is also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the Petition today.2. Recording the submission of the petitioner (Party-in-person), this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a civil suit before the competent civil court or approach the appropriate authority under the Trade Marks Act,1999.02.07.2024Index : Yes / NoSpeaking order / Non-speaking orderspToPage No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.521 of 20231.The Judicial Magistrate – I, Poonamallee. 2. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, EDF I, Avadi Police Commissionerate, Avadi, Chennai – 600 054.3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.521 of 2023M.DHANDAPANI, J.spCrl.R.C.No.521 of 202302.07.2024Page No.4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the submission of the petitioner (Party-in-person), this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a civil suit before the competent civil court or approach the appropriate authority under the Trade Marks Act,1999
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 397, 401; Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.