✦ High Court of India · 19 Mar 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 19 Mar 2025

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.98 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19.03.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSEArb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.98 of 2025Suzlon Global Services Limited.. Petitionervs1.Industrial Mineral Co.2.S.Chandresan.. RespondentsPrayer: Arbitration Original Petition (Commercial Division) filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arising out of the Operation & Management Agreement (for services), Maintenance Agreement (for parts and consumables) dated 26.03.2014 and Amendment Agreement dated 08.02.2019 concluded between the petitioner and the respondents and direct the respondents to pay costs. For Petitioner: Mr.S.Kaushik RamaswamyFor Respondents : Set exparte1/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.98 of 2025ORDER This petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short “the Act”) seeking for appointment of an Arbitrator by this Court. 2.There seems to be a dispute between the petitioner and the respondents arising out of the following agreements:- a)Operation and Management Agreement (services) dated 26.03.2014; b)Maintenance (with parts and consumables) Agreement dated 26.03.2014; and c)Amendment Agreement dated 08.02.2019. 3.In all the aforementioned agreements, there exists an arbitration clause, which is extracted hereunder:- “14. DISPUTE RESOLUTION ( Agreement dated 26.03.2014) 14.1 The Parties hereto shall attempt to resolve all differences and disputes first through mutual discussions and negotiations, in keeping with the spirit of this Agreement. 2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.98 of 202514.2 In the event that the Parties hereto are unable to settle the dispute or difference or fail to negotiate their differences whether relating to the interpretation, meaning, validity, existence or breach of this Agreement or any clause herein, within a period of 30 days from the date of the commencement of the discussion/negotiations, then the aggrieved Party shall by giving a notice to the other Party, be entitled to invoke the arbitration provisions of this Agreement. The reference shall be made to a sole arbitrator, appointed jointly by the Parties. The arbitration shall be conducted according to the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or any statutory modification or reenactment thereof. 14.3 The notice should accurately set out the disputes between the Parties, the Intention of the aggrieved Party to refer such disputes lo arbitration as provided herein and the name of the person it seeks to appoint as the sole arbitrator. All notices by one Party to the other in connection with the arbitration shall be in writing and shall be made as provided in this Agreement. 14.4 If the Parties fails to appoint an arbitrator within 30 days from the receipt of the request to do so from the other Party, then the aggrieved Party shall be free to approach the 3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.98 of 2025Court in Chennai city for appointment of the arbitrator in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the decision of such court shall be final and binding on the Parties. 14.5 The Arbitration shall be held at Chennai and the award of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on the Parties hereto. 14.DISPUTE RESOLUTION (Agreement dated 26.03.2014) 14.1 The Parties hereto shall attempt to resolve all differences and disputes first through mutual discussions and negotiations, in keeping with the spirit of this Agreement. 14.2 In the event that the Parties hereto are unable to settle the dispute or difference or fall to negotiate their differences whether relating to the interpretation, meaning, validity, existence or breach of this Agreement or any clause herein, within a period of 30 days from the date of the commencement of the discussion/negotiations, then the aggrieved Party shall by giving a notice to the other Party, be entitled to invoke the arbitration provisions of this Agreement. The reference shall be made to a sole arbitrator. appointed jointly by the Parties. The arbitration shall be conducted according to the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or any statutory modification or reenactment 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.98 of 2025thereof. 14.3 The notice should accurately sot out the disputes between the Parties, the intention of the aggrieved Party to refer such disputes to arbitration as provided herein and the name of the person il seeks to appoint as the sole arbitrator. All notices by one Party to the other in connection with the arbitration shall be in writing and shall be made as provided in this Agreement. 14.4 If the Parties fails to appoint an arbitrator within 30 days from the receipt of the request to do so from the other Party, then the aggrieved Party shall be free to approach the Court in Pune city For appointment of the arbitrator in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the decision of such court shall be final and binding the Parties. 14.5 The Arbitration shall be held at Pune and the award of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on the Parties hereto. Agreement dated 08.02.2019:- 3. Any dispute(s) out of or in relation to this amendment agreement shall be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution mechanism set out in the OMS agreements.” 4.The petitioner has invoked arbitration in accordance with the 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.98 of 2025arbitration clause by issuing notice to the respondents on 24.10.2024 as per the provisions of Section 21 of the Act. A reply has also been received from the respondents on 05.12.2024. In the said reply, the respondents have admitted the existence of the arbitration clause and they have also agreed for the appointment of an arbitrator with seat of arbitration at Chennai. 5.The respondents have been duly served with the notice in this petition. On the last hearing i.e. 12.03.2025, Mr.J.Titus Enock, learned counsel undertook to file vakalat on behalf of the respondents. But till date, no vakalat has been filed by Mr.J.Titus Enock, learned counsel on behalf of the respondents. Since the respondents have not entered appearance, they are set exparte by this Court. 6.Since there exists an arbitration clause in the Contracts, which are the subject matters of the dispute between the parties and since the petitioner has complied with the statutory requirement under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by issuing notices to the respondents on 24.10.2024 and since the respondents have also given their consent for arbitration through their reply dated 05.12.2024, this Court is appointing Mr.Arun C.Mohan, Advocate as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.98 of 2025the dispute between the parties. 7.For the foregoing reasons, this Arbitration Original Petition is allowed by issuing the following directions:(a)This Court appoints Mr.Arun C.Mohan, Advocate, having address at No.D4, III Floor, Ceebros Building, 32, Cenotaph Road, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018, Mobile No.96000 20715 as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute arising out of the Operation and Management Agreement (services) dated 26.03.2014, Maintenance (with parts and consumables) Agreement dated 26.03.2014 and Amendment Agreement dated 08.02.2019, on merits and in accordance with law;(b)The Arbitrator shall be paid his remuneration/fees in accordance with the 4th Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; (c)Both the parties shall equally share the Arbitrator's fees;(d)The Arbitrator shall conduct the arbitration in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and shall complete the arbitration within the specified time as prescribed under the said Act. No costs.19.03.2025vga7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.98 of 2025ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.vgaArb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.98 of 202519.03.20258/8

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments