Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 11.01.2025 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and…
Judgment
W.P.No.4422 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 10.02.2025CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIW.P.No.4422 of 2025 Sivakumar ... Petitioner Vs.
The Labour Commissioner cum Registrar of Trade Unions, Government of Tamil Nadu, O/o. Commissioner of Labour, 6th Floor, Labour Welfare Building, DMS-Complex, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 006.
The Joint Commissioner of Labour-I, Labour Welfare Building, 2nd Floor, DMS-Complex, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 006.
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Dr.Ambedkar Employees Union, Represented by its General Secretary, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. ... Respondents _________Page 1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.4422 of 2025PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to appoint neutral electoral officer to conduct the election of the third respondent Union in democratic manner by considering the petitioner's representation dated 11.01.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.R.RajarajanFor Respondents: Mr.M.MuraliGovernment Advocate
O R D E RThis Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to appoint neutral Electoral Officer to conduct the election of the third respondent Union in democratic manner by considering the petitioner's representation dated 11.01.2025. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has made a representation on 11.01.2025 before the respondents 1 and 2 to appoint neutral Electoral Officer to conduct the election of the third respondent _________Page 2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.4422 of 2025 Union in democratic manner, however, the same has not been considered so far. Therefore, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition with the aforesaid prayer. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it would suffice, if the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 11.01.2025, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.
The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents has no serious objection for such an order being passed by this Court.
Operative part
Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 11.01.2025 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance _________Page 3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.4422 of 2025with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 10.02.2025 NCC: Yes / NoIndex : Yes / NoSpeaking Order : Yes / NossbTo1. The Labour Commissioner cum Registrar of Trade Unions, Government of Tamil Nadu, O/o.Commissioner of Labour, 6th Floor, Labour Welfare Building, DMS-Complex, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 006.2.The Joint Commissioner of Labour-I, Labour Welfare Building, 2nd Floor, DMS-Complex, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 006._________Page 4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.4422 of 20253.Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Dr.Ambedkar Employees Union, Represented by its General Secretary, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. _________Page 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.4422 of 2025M.DHANDAPANI, J.ssbW.P.No.4422 of 202510.02.2025_________Page 6 of 6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.