T.Divyadharshini v. Dr.S.Jaghadeesan
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Tr. CMP.No.127 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :07.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHATr. CMP.No.127 of 2025andC.M.P.No.2608 of 2025T.Divyadharshini ... Petitioner Vs.Dr.S.Jaghadeesan... RespondentPrayer:- Transfer Petition is filed under Section 24 of the CPC to withdraw the case in HMOP No.159 of 2024 on the file of the Subordinate Court at Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District and transfer the same to the Subordinate Court at Tirupattur, Tirupattur District thus render Justice. For Petitioner: M/s.Ajith KumarO R D E RThe above Petition is filed to withdraw the case in HMOP No.159 of 2024 on the file of the Subordinate Court at Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District and transfer the same to the Subordinate Court at Tirupattur, Tirupattur District.1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr. CMP.No.127 of 20252. The petitioner would submit that her marriage with the respondent was solemnized on 15.02.2021 as per Hindu rites and Customs.
At the time of the marriage, the petitioner’s parents had gifted 65 sovereigns of gold jewels to her and 5 sovereigns of gold jewels to the respondent. That apart, her parents had provided her with household articles worth Rs.2,00,000/- and silver articles to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/-.3. After her marriage, the petitioner had joined her husband and set up their matrimonial home at Dharmapuri in a joint family. The petitioner would submit that for the respondent, this was his 2nd marriage as his earlier marriage had ended in a divorce. It is her case that in the initial stage of marriage, the respondent had taken care of her but later he had completely changed and started abusing and assaulting her, demanding dowry. She was also subjected to cruelty and ill-treatment at the hands of the respondent's mother and sister. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner had preferred a complaint against the respondent before the All Women Police Station.
4. While so, the petitioner had received a summons from the Subordinate Court at Dharmapuri in HMOP.No.159/2024, which was a petition for divorce filed by her husband, the respondent herein.2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr. CMP.No.127 of 20255. The petitioner has thereafter instituted proceedings for restitution of conjugal rights in HMOP.No.102/2023 before the Subordinate Court, Tirupattur and had also filed a Domestic Violence Case in DVC.No.10/2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Tirupattur. The petitioner would submit that since she is solely dependent on her parents for both her daily and basic needs and as her father is only a daily wage worker struggling to maintain the family, it would be extremely difficult for her to travel all the way to Dharmapuri to attend the hearing of the case. Such travel would not only cause mental and physical strain but also impose a financial burden on her.
Operative part
Therefore, she has filed this petition for transfer.6. Heard the counsels for the petitioner and perused the records. 7. The matter is now pending before the Subordinate Court, where the presence of parties for every hearing is not mandatory, unlike in the case of the Family Courts, where the presence for every hearing is mandatory. The petitioner can engage the services of a counsel, which she would also be doing at Tirupattur and her presence would be required only 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr. CMP.No.127 of 2025at the time of trial. Therefore, the basis on which the transfer is sought for does not merit consideration. Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.07.02.2025(shr)Index: Yes/NoSpeaking Order: Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NoTo1.The Subordinate Court, Dharmapuri2. Subordinate Court, Tirupattur4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr. CMP.No.127 of 2025P.T. ASHA . J., (shr)Tr. CMP.No.127 of 2025andC.M.P.No.2608 of 202507.02.20255/5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 24.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.