GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION v. Deputy State Tax Officer
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 31 Jan 2025
- Bench
- MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Outcome
Disposed of
By consent of both parties, the writ petition stands disposed of on the following terms:a) The impugned order dated 16
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. By consent of both parties, the writ petition stands disposed of on the following terms:a) The impugned order dated 16.07.2024 is set aside.b) The petitioner shall deposit 25% of the disputed taxes as admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent…
Judgment
W.P.No.3110 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P. No.3110 of 2025andW.M.P.Nos.3431 & 3432 of 2025GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION,REPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR MOHAMMED MUSTAFA UJJAIN WALA,NO.37/74, 2ND FLOOR, VENKATA MAISTRY STREET,MANNADY, CHENNAI 600 001.... PetitionerVs.THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER- 1/THE DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,LOAN SQUARE ASSESSMENT CIRCLE, ROOM NO.323 THIRD FLOOR,INTEGRATED COMMERCIAL TAXES BUILDING,WALL TAX ROAD, CHENNAI 600 003.... RespondentPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for records from the file of respondent in impugned assessment order in Reference No.ZD330724194460D dated 16.07.2024 passed in GSTIN/ID:33ADWPU3885G1ZR under Section 73 for the F.Y.2021-22 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.1/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.3110 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.R.AnanthFor Respondent : Mr.G.Nanmaran Special Government PleaderORDERThe present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order 16.07.2024 passed by the respondent relating to the financial year 2021-22.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is one of the leading providers of Fasteners & Industrial Materials Suppliers and is registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. During the relevant period 2021-22, the petitioner had filed its returns and paid appropriate taxes. However, on verification of the returns filed by the petitioner, it was noticed inter alia that there was mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a notice in Form ASMT-10, followed by a show cause notice in Form DRC-01 dated 06.12.2022 were issued to the petitioner through GST common portal. The petitioner had submitted its reply/response on 06.12.2022. Thereafter, after a period of one and a half years, the respondent has uploaded a reminder dated 2/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.3110 of 202504.07.2024, requiring the petitioner to submit a reply by 11.07.2024 and personal hearing was scheduled on 10.07.2024. However, the petitioner had neither paid the taxes nor availed an opportunity of personal hearing. Hence, the impugned order came to be passed, confirming its proposals.
The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that notices and orders were uploaded under the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST Portal, thereby, the petitioner was unaware of the initiated proceedings and thus unable to participate in the adjudication proceedings. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that if the petitioner is provided with an opportunity, they would be able to explain the alleged discrepancies.
The learned counsel for the petitioner would place reliance upon the recent judgment of this Court in the case of M/s.K.Balakrishnan, Balu Cables vs. O/o. the Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise in W.P.(MD)No.11924 of 2024 dated 10.06.2024, to submit that this court has remanded the matter back in similar circumstances subject to payment of 25% of the disputed taxes. 3/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.3110 of 20256. It was further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay 25% of the disputed tax and that they may be granted one final opportunity before the adjudicating authority to put forth their objections to the proposal. It is further submitted that there is bank attachment and the same may be lifted, to which, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent does not have any serious objection.
Operative part
By consent of both parties, the writ petition stands disposed of on the following terms:a) The impugned order dated 16.07.2024 is set aside.b) The petitioner shall deposit 25% of the disputed taxes as admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.c) If any amount has been recovered or paid out of the disputed taxes, including by way of pre-deposit in appeal, the same would be reduced/adjusted, from/towards the 25% of disputed taxes directed to be paid. The assessing authority shall then intimate the balance amount out of 25 % of disputed taxes to be paid, if any, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall deposit such remaining sum within a period of three weeks from such intimation.4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.3110 of 2025d) The entire exercise of verification of payment, if any, intimation of the balance sums, if any, to be paid for compliance with the direction of payment of 25% of the disputed taxes, after deducting the sums already paid and payment by the petitioner of the balance amount, if any, on intimation in compliance with the above direction shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.e) Failure to comply with the above condition viz., payment of 25% of disputed taxes within the stipulated period i.e., four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order shall result in restoration of the impugned order.f) On complying with the above condition, the impugned order of assessment shall be treated as show cause notice and the petitioner shall submit its objections within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order along with supporting documents/material.
If any such objections are filed, the same shall be considered by the respondent and orders shall be passed in accordance with law after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. It is made clear that if the above conditions viz., 25% of disputed taxes is not complied or objections are not filed within the stipulated period, four weeks respectively from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order of assessment shall stand restored.g) In view of the above order, the attachment made on the petitioner's 5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.3110 of 2025 Bank account shall be lifted /withdrawn on complying with the above condition viz., payment of 25 % of the disputed taxes.
There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 31.01.2025 Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderIndex : Yes/ NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NojdToTHE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER- 1/THE DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,LOAN SQUARE ASSESSMENT CIRCLE, ROOM NO.323 THIRD FLOOR,INTEGRATED COMMERCIAL TAXES BUILDING,WALL TAX ROAD, CHENNAI 600003.6/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.3110 of 2025MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.jdW.P. No.3110 of 202531.01.20257/7
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: By consent of both parties, the writ petition stands disposed of on the following terms:a) The impugned order dated 16
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Madras High Court, on 31 Jan 2025. The bench was MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.