Saravanapuri Goswami v. The State

Crl.O.P.No.2110 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.02.2025CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANCrl.O.P.No.2110 of 2025 Saravanapuri Goswami... PetitionerVs.The State represented by, The Station House Officer, Annamalai Nagar Police Station, Cuddalore District. (Crime No.276 of 2024).... RespondentPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the Crime No.276 of 2024, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.C.R.Gokul VisvasFor Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E RThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 20.12.2024, seeking bail in Crime No.276 of 2024 registered for the offence under Section 77 of JJ Act 2015 and under Section 275, 123 of BNS and Section 24(1) of COTPA Act, 2003.1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.2110 of 20252. The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons were found to be in illegal possession of 3.3 kgs of banned tobacco products. Hence the case.3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that the petitioner is in custody from 20.12.2024 and he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.

Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing for grant of bail to the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner along with other accused was found to be in illegal possession of 3.3 kgs of banned tobacco products. He further submitted that there is no previous case against the petitioner.5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record.2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.2110 of 20256. Considering the nature of allegation, period of incarceration and there is no previous case against the petitioner and since further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Chidambaram, and on further conditions that:[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.2110 of 2025[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.03.02.2025SmaTo1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Chidambaram.

The Station House Officer, Annamalai Nagar Police Station, Cuddalore District.

The Superintendent, Central Prison, Cuddalore4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.2110 of 2025SUNDER MOHAN., J.Sma Crl.O.P.No.2110 of 202503.02.20255/5