J.Velu v. Menaka
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cont.P.No.338 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 14.02.2024CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHCont.P.No.338 of 2024J.Velu.. PetitionervsMenaka, The District Revenue Officer, District collector officeSalem 636 001, Salem District. .. RespondentPetition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.31837 of 2023 dated 07.11.2023.For Petitioner:Mr.P.GanesanFor Respondent:Mr.S.John J.Raja SinghAdditional Government PleaderORDERMr.S.John J.Raja Singh, learned Additional Government Pleader, who accepts notice for the respondent confirms that the directions under order dated 07.11.2023 have been duly considered and an order passed on 04.12.2023 disposing the representation of the petitioner dated 16.10.2023, adverse to him. A copy of the order has been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner now for onward transmission to the petitioner. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.338 of 2024DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.ssm2.Liberty is granted to the petitioner, if inclined, to challenge this order, in accordance with law, for which purpose, the copy now supplied would suffice.3.This contempt petition stands closed in terms of this order. 14.02.2024Index:Yes/NoNeutral Citation:YesssmCont.P.No.338 of 20242/2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.