High Court · 2025

W.P.No.2494 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P. No.2494 of 2025andW.M.P.Nos.2816 & 2817 of 2025Sakthi Cables, Represented by its Partner Mr.A.Sivasubramani,No.1, Multi Industrial Area,Kundrathur Road, Gerugambakkam,Chennai 600 122, Tamil Nadu.... PetitionerVs.Commercial Tax Officer,Integrated CT Building,No.4/109, Chennai Bangalore Highways,Varadarajapuram, Nazarathpet (Chennai South),Pononamallee 600 123.... RespondentPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in the file of the Respondent and quash the Impugned Order under section 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017/Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 including the Summary of the Order in Form GST DRC-07 both dated 25.07.2024 and having Reference Number ZD330724308540P and its annexure 1/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2494 of 2025dated 25.07.2024 in Reference Number- 33ACBFS3372G1ZB/2022-23 having GSTIN-33ACBFS3372G1ZB passed by the Respondent for the FY 2022-23.For Petitioner : Mr.K.Subash Anbarasu for Mr.N.V.BalajiFor Respondent : Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government AdvocateORDERThe present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned orders dated 25.07.2024 passed by the respondent relating to the assessment year 2022-23.2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a partnership firm engaged in the business of manufacturing Aluminium Bar rods and electrical Transformers, Static Converters and Inductors and is registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. During the relevant period 2022-23, the petitioner had filed its returns and paid the appropriate taxes. However, on scrutiny of returns, it was noticed that there was mismatch between GSTR-3B and E-way bill outward supply. 3. Pursuant thereto, an intimation in Form ASMT-10 dated 14.03.2023, followed by a show cause notice in Form DRC-01 dated 02.05.2023 were issued to the petitioner through GST common portal. Further, reminder notice was 2/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2494 of 2025issued on 18.06.2024 and personal hearing opportunity was also offered to the petitioner on 18.07.2024. However, the petitioner had neither filed its reply nor availed of opportunity for personal hearing and thus, the impugned order came to be passed by the respondent, confirming the proposals. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that neither the show cause notices nor the impugned order of assessment has been served on the petitioner by tender or sending it by RPAD, instead it had been uploaded in the GST Portal, thereby, the petitioner was unaware of the initiated proceedings and was thus unable to participate in the adjudication proceedings. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that if the petitioner is provided with an opportunity, they would be able to explain the alleged discrepancies. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner would place reliance upon the recent judgment of this Court in the case of M/s.K.Balakrishnan, Balu Cables vs. O/o. the Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise in W.P.(MD)No.11924 of 2024 dated 10.06.2024, to submit that this court has remanded the matter back in similar circumstances subject to payment of 25% of the disputed taxes.3/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2494 of 20256. It was further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay 25% of the disputed tax and that they may be granted one final opportunity before the adjudicating authority to put forth their objections to the proposal, to which the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent does not have any serious objection.7. By consent of parties, this writ petition stands disposed of on the following terms:a) The impugned orders dated 25.07.2024 are set aside.b) The petitioner shall deposit 25% of the disputed taxes as admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.c) If any amount has been recovered or paid out of the disputed taxes, including by way of pre-deposit in appeal, the same would be reduced/adjusted, from/towards the 25% of disputed taxes directed to be paid. The assessing authority shall then intimate the balance amount out of 25 % of disputed taxes to be paid, if any, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall deposit such remaining sum within a period of three weeks from such intimation.d) The entire exercise of verification of payment, if any, intimation of the 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2494 of 2025balance sums, if any, to be paid for compliance with the direction of payment of 25% of the disputed taxes, after deducting the sums already paid and payment by the petitioner of the balance amount, if any, on intimation in compliance with the above direction shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.e) Failure to comply with the above condition viz., payment of 25% of disputed taxes within the stipulated period i.e., four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order shall result in restoration of the impugned order.f) If there is any recovery by way of attachment of Bank account or garnishee proceedings, the same shall be lifted /withdrawn on complying with the above condition viz., payment of 25 % of the disputed taxes. g) On complying with the above condition, the impugned order of assessment shall be treated as show cause notice and the petitioner shall submit its objections within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order along with supporting documents/material. If any such objections are filed, the same shall be considered by the respondent and orders shall be passed in accordance with law after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. It is made clear that if the above conditions viz., 25% of disputed taxes is not complied or objections are not filed within the stipulated period, four weeks respectively from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, 5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2494 of 2025the impugned order of assessment shall stand restored.8. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 28.01.2025 Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderIndex : Yes/ NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NojdToCommercial Tax Officer,Integrated CT Building,No.4/109, Chennai Bangalore Highways,Varadarajapuram, Nazarathpet (Chennai South),Pononamallee 600 123.6/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2494 of 2025MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.jdW.P. No.2494 of 202528.01.20257/7