✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

G K ILANTHIRAIYAN

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Crl.O.P.No.1960 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 14.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYANCrl.O.P.No.1960 of 20251. Jothyaraj2. Dhanasekaran ... PetitionersVs.State through The Inspector of Police, Roshanai Police Station, Villupuram District. (Crime No.13 of 2025) ... RespondentPRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No.13 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners: Mr.P.M.JayachandranFor Respondent: Mr.A.GopinathGovernment Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.01.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.13 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 274, 275, 112(2), 123 BNS Act read with Section 24(1) of COTPA Act 2003. Page No.1 of 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.1960 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN , J. sma2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that there is a proposal for detaining the petitioners under Goondas Act.3. In the light of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 14.02.2025 SmaCrl.O.P.No.1960 of 2025 Page No.2 of 2

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 112(2), 123, 274, 275; COTPA Act, 2003 — s. 24(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments