✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

R SURESH KUMAR, N SENTHILKUMAR

Case at a glance

Bench
R SURESH KUMAR, N SENTHILKUMAR

Outcome

Withdrawn

Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. P.Dhanapakkiam..RespondentsPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order dated 22.07.2025 in R.P.No.417 of 2019 passed by the first respondent herein and quash the same as it being…

Judgment

W.P.No.7119 of 2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 09.03.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR ANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMARW.P.No.7119 of 20261. R.Thilagam2. R.Shyamala Bai..PetitionersVs.

1.

The Central Bank of India Rep. By its Branch Manager Agraharam Road Branch, Salem – 636 001.

Operative part

2.

P.Dhanapakkiam..RespondentsPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order dated 22.07.2025 in R.P.No.417 of 2019 passed by the first respondent herein and quash the same as it being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. For the Petitioners: Mr.S.SilambananSenior Counselfor Mr.K.VasanthanayaganFor the Respondents: Mr.Akshai ManiStanding Counselfor R1Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7119 of 2026ORDER(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)Mr.S.Silambanan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.K.Vasanthanayagan, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal for appropriate relief.2. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. However, there shall be no order as to costs. W.M.P.No.7732 of 2026, petition filed seeking permission to file a single writ petition, stands ordered, inasmuch as the petitioners have paid separate set of court fees. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.7734 and 7737 of 2026 are closed. (R.S.K., J.) (N.S., J.) 09.03.2026 Speaking Order/Non-Speaking OrderNeutral Citation: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoIndex: Yes/No(drm)Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7119 of 2026To:1. The Branch Manager The Central Bank of India Agraharam Road Branch, Salem – 636 001. Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7119 of 2026R. SURESH KUMAR, J.AND N. SENTHILKUMAR, J.(drm) W.P.No.7119 of 202609.03.2026Page 4 of 4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments