✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Judgment

S.A.No.1071 of 2010IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.03.2024CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANS.A.No.1071 of 20101.Kalaiselvi2.Malarkodi3.Thirunavukarasu... Appellants/Appellants/PlaintiffsVs.1.Santha2.Paneerselvam3.Krishnamoorthy4.Alamelu... Respondents/Respondents 2-5/DefendantsPrayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and decree in A.S.No.51 of 2006, on the file of Additional Sub Judge at Tiruvannamalai dated 26.11.2009 in confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.274 of 2002, on the file of Additional District Munsif, Chengam dated 21.02.2006.For Appellants: Mrs.R.Abirami for M/s.V.SrimathiFor Respondents R1 to R3: Mr.J.RamakrishnanR4: ExpartePage No 1 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.1071 of 2010JUDGMENTThe learned counsel for appellants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this second appeal. She also filed a memo which is signed by the first appellant viz., Kalaiselvi along with the Aadhar card. The learned counsel also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 25.03.2024Index : Yes/NoSpeaking Order : Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NodpaTo:1. The Additional District Munsif, Chengam2.The Additional Sub Judge, Tiruvannamalai3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, High Court of Madras. Page No 2 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.1071 of 2010G.ARUL MURUGAN , J. dpaS.A.No.1071 of 2010 25.03.2024Page No 3 of 3

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments