K.Krishnan v. R.V.Subramaniam Nadar2.R.V.Jayarani3.Vijaya Bhaskar4.Balakumar5.Rama Nadar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, this Second Appeal stands dismissed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Again there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Steps have not been taken against R2 to R5. Hence, this Second Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 10.07.2025Index: Yes / NoNeutral Citation: Yes / Nogsk2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.1010 of…
Judgment
S.A.No.1010 of 2009IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 10.07.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYANS.A.No.1010 of 2009 andM.P.No.1 of 2009K.Krishnan ... Appellant / PlaintiffVs.
R.V.Subramaniam Nadar2.R.V.Jayarani3.Vijaya Bhaskar4.Balakumar5.Rama Nadar ... Respondents / DefendantsPrayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 2.8.2007 passed in A.S.No.215 of 2006 on the file of the First Additional City Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai and also the decree and judgment dated 19.11.2004 passed in O.S.No.2279 of 2003 on the file of the First Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. For Appellant: No appearance1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.1010 of 2009JUDGMENTThis Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment and decree dated 2.8.2007 passed in A.S.No.215 of 2006 on the file of the First Additional City Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai and also the decree and judgment dated 19.11.2004 passed in O.S.No.2279 of 2003 on the file of the First Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
On 27.06.2025, this Court has made the following observations: "The matter had been adjourned from 06.01.2023 for notice to R2 to R5. Steps have not been taken. Affidavit of Service have not been filed. The appeal has already been dismissed as abated against R1. Post the matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 10.07.2025."
Operative part
Again there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Steps have not been taken against R2 to R5. Hence, this Second Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 10.07.2025Index: Yes / NoNeutral Citation: Yes / Nogsk2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.1010 of 2009To1.The First Additional City Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. 2. The First Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.1010 of 2009C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J. gskS.A.No.1010 of 2009 andM.P.No.1 of 200910.07.20254/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, this Second Appeal stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.