Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Narayana Reddy Chartram, Thottapalayam, Vellore – 632 004.... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent herein in Notice No.3092/2018…
Judgment
W.P.No.2007 of 2020IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANIW.P.No.2007 of 2020andW.M.P.Nos.2345 & 2347 of 20201.V.Venugopal (Deceased)
V.B.Muralikrishnan... PetitionersVs.1.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Vellore. 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Vellore.
Operative part
The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Narayana Reddy Chartram, Thottapalayam, Vellore – 632 004.... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent herein in Notice No.3092/2018 (ITMS Code 4796)M1 dated 29.11.2019 and quash the same and further direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein not to interfere with the management of Srimath Thukkaram Swamigal Madayalam, Kalasapalayam, Vellore – 1 Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2007 of 2020till the disposal of the scheme application in O.A.No.2 of 2019 pending before the 1st respondent herein. For Petitioners: Mr.N.VelmuruganFor Respondents: Mr.K.KarthikeyanGovernment Advocate [R1 & R2]Mr.Wilson Topazfor M/s.A.S.Kailasam & Associates [R3]*****ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that by efflux of time, the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and there is nothing survives for adjudication.2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 03.09.2025Index : Yes / NoSpeaking order / Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation Case : Yes / NospToPage No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2007 of 20201.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Vellore. 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Vellore. 3. The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Narayana Reddy Chartram, Thottapalayam, Vellore – 632 004. Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2007 of 2020M.DHANDAPANI, J.spW.P.No.2007 of 202003.09.2025Page No.4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.