✦ Madras High Court

P.Pandian v. Industrial Security Force GP Headquarters

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous

Provisions considered

Judgment

W.P.No.2546 of 2021IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 23.08.2024CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGHW.P.No.2546 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.2889 & 2891 of 2021P.Pandian... PetitionerVs.1.The Central Industrial Security Force, Rep by its Director General, Headquarters, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003.2.The Deputy Inspector General, South Zone, Headquarters, Central Industrial Security Force, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai 600 090.3.Group Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force GP Headquarters, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai 600 090.4.Assistant Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Kamaraj Port Limited (E) Ennor, Chennai.... RespondentsPage 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2546 of 2021Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the concerned records from the respondents 3 and 4, quash the order of the third respondent bearing Group HQRS Chennai Service Order Part-1, No.39/2020 dated 27.04.2020 in so far as holding the petition2022 is not fit for III MACP and the order of the fourth respondent dated 13.05.2020 bearing E.37032/CISF/KPL(E)/Doc/2020/825 holding that the petition2022 is not fit for III MACP as the petition2022 was not fit due to last Annual Performance Appraisal Report-2011 is good and not having three Very Good in last five years as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents to extend III MACP to the petition2022 with effect from 01.07.2019 being the date of completion of 30 years of service and promote the petitioner to the post of Head Constable from the year 2010 onwards with all consequential benefits. For Petitioner: M/s.Balan HaridasFor Respondents: Mr.R.Prasath, ACGSC O R D E RIt is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the relief sought in this Writ Petition has become infructuous and he also made an endorsement to that effect. Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2546 of 20212. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions, if any shall stand closed.23.08.2024vkrIndex : Yes / NoSpeaking order / Non-speaking orderTo1.The Central Industrial Security Force, Rep by its Director General, Headquarters, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003.2.The Deputy Inspector General, South Zone, Headquarters, Central Industrial Security Force, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai 600 090.3.Group Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force GP Headquarters, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai 600 090.4.Assistant Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Kamaraj Port Limited (E) Ennor, Chennai. Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2546 of 2021VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.vkrW.P.No.2546 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.2889 & 2891 of 202123.08.2024Page 4 of 4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments