Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the Appellant, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
S.A.No.526 of 2002IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVELSA NO. 526 OF 2002and CMP No. 4788 of 20031. D.SingaraveluS/o. Dharmalingam Mudaliar8-A, C.N.Annadurai St.Kancheerpuram – 3. Appellant / Appellant / PlaintiffVs1. Amudha NaickerS/o. Munuswamy Naickeer2. ThirumavalavanS/o. Thangavel Naickeerboth residing at Selimedu Village & Post, Kancheerpuram TalukRespondent(s) / Respondents / DefendantsPRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. praying to set aside the Judgment and decree dated November 25, 1994 passed in A.S.No.40 of 1992 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Kancheerpuam, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated September 8, 1990 passed in O.S.No.725 of 1984 by the District Munsif, Kancheepuram by allowing the Second Appeal with costs throughout by decreeing the suit in O.S.No.725 of 1984. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.526 of 2002 For Appellant(s):Ms.Vidhya Sreefor M/s.A.SumathiFor Respondent(s):M/s.Y.Jothish Chander For R1R2 - Died [vide Cmp]R3 - Dismissed - Vide Court Order Dt. 14/02/2023JUDGMENTMs.Vidhya Sree, representing Ms.A.Sumathi, learned Counsel on record for the Appellant is before this Court and Mr.Y.Jothish Chander, learned Counsel on record for the First Respondent is before this Court through Video Conferencing mode.2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant reports no instructions and to that effect she has made an endorsement in the case file. Scanned reproduction of the same is as follows: https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.526 of 20023. In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the Appellant, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently connected connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.03-03-2026Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet: YesNeutral Citation: Yes/NobknTo:
Sub-Judge, Kancheerpuam.
District Munsif, Kancheerpuram. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.526 of 2002R.SAKTHIVEL J.bkn SA NO. 526 OF 200203-03-2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the Appellant, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.