Gunasekar @ Sekar v. M/s.Entech HVAC Solutions
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Even till today, since steps have not been taken to serve notice on the first respondent, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
C.M.A.No.484 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUE AT MADRASDATED: 19.07.2024CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSEC.M.A.No.484 of 2007 Gunasekar @ Sekar .. AppellantVs1.M/s.Entech HVAC Solutions, Rep. By Ramasamy, Kasi Estates, Jafferkhanpet, Chennai – 83.2.The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Purasawalkam High Road, Chennai – 7. .. RespondentsPrayer: This Appeal is filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against the order dated 24.04.2006 passed in W.C.No.339 of 2005 by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II (Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation-II), Chennai – 6. For Appellant : Mr.A.ShanmugarajRespondents - dismissed1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.484 of 2007JUDGMENTThis appeal is of the year 2007. Till date, steps have not been taken to serve notice on the first respondent. By order dated 03.06.2024, it was made clear that if steps are not taken to serve notice on the respondents before the next hearing date, the appeal shall stand automatically dismissed for non-prosecution as against the respondents. The matter came up for hearing on 08.07.2024 and once again, the matter was adjourned to 19.07.2024. Even till today, since steps have not been taken to serve notice on the first respondent, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No Costs. 19.07.2024Index: yes/noNeutral citation: yes/no rkm2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.484 of 2007ToDeputy Commissioner of Labour-II,(Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation-II),Chennai.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.484 of 2007ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.rkm C.M.A. No.484 of 2007 19.07.20244/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Even till today, since steps have not been taken to serve notice on the first respondent, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 — s. 30.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.