✦ High Court of India · 08 Jan 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 08 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
08 Jan 2025
Length
1,010 words

W.P.No.386 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 08.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQW.P.No.386 of 2025andW.M.P.Nos.438 and 439 of 2025 M/s.Manomani Agencies Represented by its ProprietrixMrs.S.Manonmani ..Petitioner Vs.1.The State Tax Officer (ST) (FAC), Thirumullaivoyal Assessment Circle, Door No.32, Room No.114, 1st Floor, Thiruvallur Division, Integrated Commercial Taxes Offices Building, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Vepery, Chennai-600 0032.The Appellate Authority, O/o. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) GST Appeal Chennai-I Greams Road, 2nd Floor, Room No.210 Chennai ..RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the first respondent 1/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.386 of 2025herein in GSTIN:33AEVPM8567P1ZA/2017-18 dated 27.12.2023 and the consequential rejection order passed by the second respondent in ARN# AD330824013124K dated 18.10.2024 and quash the same and pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.Raveendran BFor Respondent : Mr.G.Nanmaran Special Government Pleader ORDERThe present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 27.12.2023 relating to the assessment year 2017-18. 2. The petitioner is a registered dealer under Goods and Services Act, 2017. During the relevant period, the petitioner had filed its return and paid appropriate taxes. However, on verification of the monthly returns, it was found that there was mismatch between Form 26AS and GSTR-1. 2.1. Pursuant thereto, a show notice in DRC-01 was issued to the petitioner on 14.08.2023. Further, personal hearing was offered on 14.08.2023, 23.09.2023, 2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.386 of 202527.11.2023 and 23.12.2023. In response to the same, the petitioner filed its reply on 23.09.2023, however the same was rejected on the premise that the petitioner had not filed supporting documents in the form of reconciliation statement to show that Form 26AS also covers Pre GST period and the impugned order came to be passed, confirming the proposal. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner had filed an appeal and the same was rejected on the ground that the appeal was filed beyond the period stipulated for filing appeal under the Act. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would place reliance upon the recent judgment of this Court in the case of M/s.K.Balakrishnan, Balu Cables vs. O/o. the Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise in W.P.(MD)No.11924 of 2024 dated 10.06.2024. It was further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay 25% of the disputed tax and that he may be granted one final opportunity before the adjudicating authority to put forth their objections to the proposal. It is further submitted that subsequent to the passing of the impugned order, the petitioner had filed an appeal along with 10% pre-deposit and his only request is that the same may be adjusted towards 25% of the disputed tax, to which the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the 3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.386 of 2025respondents does not have any serious objection, while seeking liberty to verify the correctness of the statement relating to remittance made by the petitioner. 4. By consent of parties, the writ petition stands disposed of on the following terms:a) The impugned order dated 27.12.2023 is set asideb) The petitioner shall deposit 25% of the disputed taxes as admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.c) If any amount has been recovered or paid out of the disputed taxes, including by way of pre-deposit in appeal, the same would be reduced/adjusted, from/towards the 25% of disputed taxes directed to be paid. The assessing authority shall then intimate the balance amount out of 25 % of disputed taxes to be paid, if any, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall deposit such remaining sum within a period of three weeks from such intimation.d) The entire exercise of verification of payment, if any, intimation of the balance sums, if any, to be paid for compliance with the direction of payment of 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.386 of 202525% of the disputed taxes, after deducting the sums already paid and payment by the petitioner of the balance amount, if any, on intimation in compliance of the above direction, shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.e) Failure to comply with the above condition viz., payment of 25% of disputed taxes within the stipulated period i.e., four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order shall result in restoration of the impugned order.f) If there is any recovery by way of attachment of Bank account or garnishee proceedings, the same shall be lifted /withdrawn on complying with the above condition viz., payment of 25 % of the disputed taxes. g) On complying with the above condition, the impugned order of assessment shall be treated as show cause notice and the petitioner shall submit its objections within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order along with supporting documents/material. If any such objections are filed, the same shall be considered by the respondent and orders shall be passed in accordance with law after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. It is made clear that if the above conditions viz., 25% of disputed taxes is not complied or objections are not filed within the stipulated period, four weeks 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.386 of 2025respectively from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order of assessment shall stand restored.5. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.08.01.2025Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderNeutral Citation: Yes/NomrnTo1.The State Tax Officer (ST) (FAC), Thirumullaivoyal Assessment Circle, Door No.32, Room No.114, 1st Floor, Thiruvallur Division, Integrated Commercial Taxes Offices Building, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Vepery, Chennai-600 0032.The Appellate Authority, O/o. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) GST Appeal Chennai-I Greams Road, 2nd Floor, Room No.210 Chennai 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.386 of 2025MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.mrnW.P.No.386 of 2025andW.M.P.Nos.438 and 439 of 20257/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.386 of 202508.01.20258/8

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments