Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- M S RAMESH, N SENTHILKUMAR
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. [M.S.R., J] [N.S., J] 03.03.2025Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NoAnuPage 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP.No.405 of 2025To1. The Superintendent Of PoliceVillupuram…
Judgment
HCP.No.405 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.03.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESHANDTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR H.C.P.No.405 of 2025SELVIPetitioner(s) Vs1. The Superintendent Of PoliceVillupuram District2.The State Rep By TheInspector Of Police, Kiliyanur Police Station, Villupuram District.3.BALAJIS/o Dhayalan, Kotturoadu, Adhanapattu, Vanur Taluk, Villupuram DistrictRespondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct the 2nd respondent to produce the petitioner's daughter Miss. Haripriya, D/o Murugan, aged about 21 years before this Court, who are under the illegal custody of the 3rd respondent Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP.No.405 of 2025since 13/12/2024 and set her at liberty. For Petitioner: Mr.R. KarunagaranFor Respondents: Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester JohnORDERM.S.RAMESH, J.andN.SENTHILKUMAR, J.The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdrawn this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.
Operative part
In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. [M.S.R., J] [N.S., J] 03.03.2025Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NoAnuPage 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP.No.405 of 2025To1. The Superintendent Of PoliceVillupuram District2.The Inspector Of Police, Kiliyanur Police Station, Villupuram District.
The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HCP.No.405 of 2025M.S.RAMESH, J.andN.SENTHILKUMAR, J.Anu H.C.P.No.405 of 202503.03.2025Page 4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.