Anjalakshi Ammal v. Dhanabaggiam (died)2. Balakrishnan (died)3. Mangammal4. Ellappan5. Seeyalan6. Pandurangan7. Murugammal8. Rajeswari9. Janaki10. B.Mani
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S S SUNDAR, A A NAKKIRAN
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 41 r. 1; s. 96
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Mangammal4. Ellappan5. Seeyalan6. Pandurangan7. Murugammal8. Rajeswari9. Janaki10. B.Mani .. Respondents[R1 died. Respondents 3 to 7 were brought on record as LRs of the deceased R1 as per the memo dated 08.11.2022 and vide order of this Court dated 08.11.2022 in A.S.No.290 of 2016][R2 died.…
Judgment
AS. No.290 of 2016IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED 21.12.2022CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDARandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRANAS. No.290 of 2016 Anjalakshi Ammal .. AppellantVersus1. Dhanabaggiam (died)
Balakrishnan (died)
Operative part
Mangammal4. Ellappan5. Seeyalan6. Pandurangan7. Murugammal8. Rajeswari9. Janaki10. B.Mani .. Respondents[R1 died. Respondents 3 to 7 were brought on record as LRs of the deceased R1 as per the memo dated 08.11.2022 and vide order of this Court dated 08.11.2022 in A.S.No.290 of 2016][R2 died. Respondents 8 to 10 were brought on record as LRs of the deceased R2, vide order of this Court, dated 11.10.2022 made in CMP.Nos.13332, 13333, & 13336 of 2022 in AS.No.290 of 2016.]PRAYER: First Appeal filed under Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC r/w Section 96 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2015 passed in OS.No.187 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the District Judge No.II, Kanchipuram.1 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS. No.290 of 2016 For appellants: Ms.J.T.Ajitha for M/s.K.Govi GanesanFor respondents for R4: Mr.S.Saravanan for Mr.N.NithianandanJ U D G M E N T(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.S.SUNDAR, J) Despite several adjournments being given, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant is not ready on various occasions. On the last occasion also the matter was adjourned on the representation that the parties are negotiating for settlement. This Court therefore posted the appeal today under the caption "for reporting settlement". 2. Today, the learned counsel for the appellant reported that there is no settlement and once again submitted that he is not ready with the case. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. (S.S.S.R.J.) (A.A.N.J.) 21.12.2022Speaking Order : Yes / NoIndex : Yes / Nopvs2 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS. No.290 of 2016To1. The District Judge No.II, Kanchipuram2. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras3 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS. No.290 of 2016S.S.SUNDAR , J. andA.A.NAKKIRAN , J. pvsAS. No.290 of 201621.12.20224 / 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 41 r. 1; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 96.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.