Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RMT TEEKAA RAMAN
Outcome
Allowed
Considering the submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and on being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, in the interest of justice, this petition is allowed
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and on being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, in the interest of justice, this petition is allowed.
Judgment
1WMP.No.2726 of 2025inW.P.No.30978 of 2015RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.,It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner - Ramasamy had died.
This petition has been filed to substitute 1)Mrs. Sajoja, 2)R.Ravikumar and 3)Mrs.R.Abarna, the L.Rs of the writ petitioner late Mr.P.Ramasamy to contest the case.
Heard both sides. The factum of the death of the petitioner-Ramasamy in W.P.No.30978 of 2015 and the proposed parties are the legal representatives are not in dispute.
Operative part
Considering the submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and on being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, in the interest of justice, this petition is allowed.
The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title within a period of two weeks. 05.02.2025 nvi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.,nviWMP.No.2726 of 2025 inW.P.No.30978 of 201505.02.2025
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.