#S.Pitchai v. Trichy, Trichy District
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 21 Jun 2002
- Bench
- C SARAVANAN
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition for National Highways Authority of India, O/o. District Minority and Backward Class, Trichy, Trichy District. ... Respondents in both petitions COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari…
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN +W.P.(MD) Nos.18721 of 2013 to 18723 of 2013 W.M.P.(MD).Nos.1,1,1 and 2,2,2 of 2013 #S.Pitchai ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.18721 of 2013 V.Subramanian ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.18722 of 2013 V.Mariappan ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.18723 of 2013 vs. $1.The District Forest Officer, Trichy, Trichy District.
The Commissioner, Most Backward Class and Denotified Community Department, Chepauk, Chennai~5.
The Welfare Officer, District Minority and Backward Class, Trichy, Trichy District.
The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition for National Highways Authority of India, O/o. District Minority and Backward Class, Trichy, Trichy District. ... Respondents in both petitions COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the proceedings of the first respondent vide Na.Ka.No.Pa3/12626/2010, dated 03.02.2012, respectively and quash the same. !For Petitioner : No Appearance (in both petitions) ^For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiyagarajan (in both petitions) Government Advocate :COMMON ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing on 13.11.2018, there was no representation for the petitioners and hence, these writ petitions were ordered to be listed under the caption -for dismissal- on 14.11.2018. Even, today (14.11.2018), when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. Hence, these Writ Petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. To:
The District Forest Officer, Trichy, Trichy District.
2. The Commissioner, Most Backward Class and Denotified Community Department, Chepauk, Chennai~5.
3. The Welfare Officer, District Minority and Backward Class, Trichy, Trichy District.
4. The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition for National Highways Authority of India, O/o. District Minority and Backward Class, Trichy, Trichy District.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Madras High Court, on 21 Jun 2002. The bench was C SARAVANAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.