Madras High Court · 2002
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN +Crl.O.P.(MD).No.14128 of 2015 #Shavithiri ...Petitioner / Defacto Complainant Vs. $1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.
The Inspector of Police, K.Pudupatti Police Station, Pudukkottai District. (Crime No.94 of 2015) ... Respondents 1 and 2 / Complainants
Kasthuri 4. Pandiammal 5. Vellaisamy 6. Deivanai ...Respondents 3 to 6 /Accused Nos.1 to 4 PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the amendment report filed by the second respondent police and further investigate the case in S.T.C.No.260 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, Pudukkottai District. !For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mathavan ^For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Chairma Prabhu Government Advocate (Crl. Side) :ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to set aside the amendment report filed by the second respondent police and further investigate the case in S.T.C.No.260 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, Pudukkottai District.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State submitted that the petition mentioned case was disposed, in which, the respondents 3 to 6 / accused 1 to 4 were convicted. Hence, the prayer sought for in this Criminal Original Petition has become infructuous.
Operative part
3. The aforesaid submission is recorded. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.
2. The Inspector of Police, K.Pudupatti Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
3. The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, Pudukkottai District.
The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Madras High Court, on 19 Jun 2002. The bench was G K ILANTHIRAIYAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.