Judgment · High Court
Judgment
C.M.P.Nos .2139 and 2141 of 2024 in W.A.SR.Nos.165 and 164 of 2024 R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDP.DHANABAL, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.]These civil miscellaneous petitions have been filed to condone the delay in filing the above writ appeals.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
Mr.N.Subramanian takes notice for the respondents and he has no serious objection in allowing the petitions.
Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of the petitions, these petitions are ordered and the delay is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the appeals and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order.[R.S.K., J.] [P.D.B, J.] 21.08.2025 KST
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.