D.Suresh Sathiyakumar v. M.J.EarthmoverPartnership Firm
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Limitation Act, 1963 s. 5
Judgment
Crl.M.P.No.40 of 2024in Crl.A.SrNo.43333 of 2019IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED:19.06.2025CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYANCrl.M.P.No.40 of 2024inCrl.A.Sr.No.43333 of 2019D.Suresh Sathiyakumar...PetitionerVs.
M.J.EarthmoverPartnership Firm,15/36/213 V.O.C.Nagar, Thangamapuripattinam, Mettur Dam – 636 402.
M.John David3. A.Murugan ... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 1130 days in filing the above appeal against the judgment in STC No.221 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Mettur, dated 27.07.2016.For Petitioner: Mr.B.GopalakrishnanFor R2 and R3: Mr.S.V.S.IlamvazhuthiPage 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.40 of 2024in Crl.A.SrNo.43333 of 2019ORDEROn 04.06.2025 this Court allowed this petition on condition that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- directly to the respondents, within a period of two weeks and adjourned this matter to 18.06.2025 for reporting compliance.2. When the matter is taken up today, it is submitted that the petitioner has complied the conditions imposed in the order dated 04.06.2025.
In view of the said compliance, the petition stands ordered. Registry is directed the number the above Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order.19.06.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral citation: Yes/NoInternet : YesSpeaking/non-speaking orderbknPage 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.40 of 2024in Crl.A.SrNo.43333 of 2019To1.The Judicial Magistrate, Mettur. Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.40 of 2024in Crl.A.SrNo.43333 of 2019G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.bknCrl.M.P.No.40 of 2024inCrl.A.Sr.No.43333 of 201919.06.2025Page 4 of 4
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.