P.DHANABALContempt Petition No.33 of 2025 R.Krishnan (died)1. Manimegalai2. K.Premnath3. K.Arivazhagan4. K.Poonkuzhali5. K.Kokilavani v. Palaniraj
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cont.P.No.33 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 12.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU ANDTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABALContempt Petition No.33 of 2025 R.Krishnan (died)
Manimegalai2. K.Premnath3. K.Arivazhagan4. K.Poonkuzhali5. K.KokilavaniPetitioners 1 to 5 are residing at No.53, Ponnenkollai, Kanji Post, Chengam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District - 606 702... PetitionersVs. Palaniraj, Superintending Engineer, Thiruvannamalai Electricity Distribution Circle, Thiruvanamalai...RespondentContempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience and on-compliance of the common order passed in W.A.No.3356 and 3358 of 2023 dated 10.07.2024 passed by this Court For Petitioners : Mr.S.N.RavichandranPage 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.33 of 2025 For Respondent : Mr.Anand Gopalan, Standing Counsel for EBO R D E R(The order of the Court was made by J.Nisha Banu,J.) Learned counsel for the contemnor would state that the entire pensionary benefits as directed by this Court in the order passed W.A.No.3356 and 3358 of 2023 dated 10.07.2024 had been deposited and the petitioners have already withdrawn 50% of the deposited amount, which is not disputed by the petitioners.
The contemnor would state that the petitioners can also withdraw the balance amount.
The petitioners are to liberty to withdraw the balance 50% amount which was already deposited.
With the above observation, this Contempt Petition is closed. (J.N.B,J.) (P.D.B., J.)Index: Yes / No12.08.2025Internet: Yes vsiPage 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.33 of 2025J. NISHA BANU, J. and P.DHANABAL,J.vsiCont.P.No.33 of 202512.08.2025Page 3/3
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.