Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- N ANAND VENKATESH
Provisions considered
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 s. 9(ii)(B)
Judgment
Application No.2882 of 2001IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESHApplication No.2882 of 2001M/s.Sundaram Finance Limited,21, Pattullos Road, Chennai – 600 002..... ApplicantVs.
S.K.Naveen2.S.K.Jagadish3.S.T.Kirshnappa.... RespondentsApplication filed under Section 9(ii)(B) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a direction to respondents to furnish security in a sum of Rs.2,60,000/- within such time fixed by this Court, failing which pass an order of attachment of the property described in the schedule. For Applicant: No appearanceFor Respondents: No appearance*****ORDERThis application has been filed seeking a direction to respondents to furnish security for a sum of Rs.2,60,000/-, in the year 2001.1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Application No.2882 of 2001N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.It is almost 14 years since this application was filed. Nothing will survive at this point of time. Hence, this application is closed.19.01.2026NCC: Yes/NogmApplication No.2882 of 20012/2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.