Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, the delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed
Judgment
C.M.P.No.653 of 2025 inW.A.(SR).No.133826 of 2024S. M. SUBRAMANIAM,J.ANDK. RAJASEKAR,J.(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 45 days in filing the above writ appeal in W.A.(SR).No.133826 of 2024.2. The learned counsel for the respondent made an objection by stating that the reasons stated in the affidavit would be insufficient to condone the delay of 45 days.3. However this Court is of the considered opinion that the meagre delay in filing the writ appeal is to be considered for this condonation. Further, the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the miscellaneous petition would be sufficient to condone the delay.4. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. (S.M.S, J.) (K.R.S, J.) 04.03.2025 ssiNote: Registry is directed to number the above writ appeal, if it is otherwise in order.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.