Smt.Gunwantibai Govind Gujar, Since dead, through her LR’s Dipchand T. Shah v. Narhari Kashiba Edake & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RANJIT MORE
Provisions considered
Judgment
Smt. Gunwantibai Govind Gujar, Since dead, through her LR’s Dipchand T. Shah :: Petitioner Versus Narhari Kashiba Edake & Ors, ::Respondents. Mr.Sandesh Patil a/w Mr.Akshay Shah, Advocate for the Petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM DATED :: :: RANJIT MORE, J. 20th November, 2012. P.C. : Heard. By the impugned order, Trial Court refused the appointment of Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of “The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908”. It is settled law that, CourtCommissioner cannot be appointed for collecting the evidence, for the parties. In that view of the matter, I do not find error in the impugned order so as to enable me to invoke jurisdiction of this Court conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.