✦ Bombay High Court · 25 Feb 2011

Judgment · High Court · 2011

D G KARNIK

Case at a glance

Decided
25 Feb 2011
Bench
D G KARNIK

Outcome

Dismissed

The Appeal is dismissed under Order 41

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE FIRST APPEAL NO. 901 OF 1999 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders None present for the Appellants. Mr. P.J.Shinde for the Respondents. ­­­ CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 25th FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C.:­ 1 Counsel for the respondents is present. None appears for the Appellants. 2 The Appeal is dismissed under Order 41 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

(D.G. KARNIK, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Appeal is dismissed under Order 41

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 41 r. 17.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 25 Feb 2011. The bench was D G KARNIK.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments