RMA v. Vijay Manju Jadhav
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Leave to prefer Appeal against the accused is granted.
Judgment
Mr. A.A. Siddiqui i/b M/s. A.A. Siddiqui & Asso for the Respondent CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J DATE : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C.:
Heard the learned APP and the learned counsel for the respondent - original accused. Perused the impugned judgment.
Leave to prefer Appeal against the accused is granted.
Appeal be registered.
Appeal admitted. Action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C. be initiated. [ J.H. BHATIA, J ] 1
APPLN 76111.doc 2
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 390.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 08 Sep 2011. The bench was H BHATIA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.