The State of Maharashtra v. Rajendra Keshav Bhasar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Leave to appeal is granted. Appeal is admitted. Action under Section 390 of Code of Criminal Procedure be taken. (D.D.SINHA,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.)
Judgment
Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.D SINHA & A.R.JOSHI,JJ DATED : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2010 P.C. :
1.
Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Leave to appeal is granted. Appeal is admitted. Action under Section 390 of Code of Criminal Procedure be taken. (D.D.SINHA,J.)
(A.R.JOSHI,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 390.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 23 Sep 2010. The bench was D D SINHA, A R JOSHI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Application No. 2830 of 2010).
← Search more judgments