✦ Bombay High Court · 22 Jul 2011

CRIMINAL APPELLEATE SIDE v. Shamrao Aba Jadhav

Criminal Application No. 528 of 2011K U CHANDIWAL, NARESH H PATIL

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 390

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLEATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 528 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra ... Applicant Versus Shamrao Aba Jadhav ... Respondent Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATED : JULY 22, 2011 P.C. Heard. Perused the record. Admit. Action under Section 390 Cr.P.C. be taken. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)

(NARESH H. PATIL,J.)

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 390.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 22 Jul 2011. The bench was K U CHANDIWAL, NARESH H PATIL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Application No. 528 of 2011). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Which court decided this case, and when?

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

More cases under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Continue researching