Judgment · High Court · 2005
Case at a glance
Outcome
Partly allowed
The appeal is partly allowed
Judgment
FIRST APPEAL NO.1097 OF 1994. FIRST APPEAL NO.1097 OF 1994. FIRST APPEAL NO.1097 OF 1994. Bank of ndia : Appellants. versus Shri Arun Vishnu Chougule & ors.: Respondents. Mr.C.R.Dalvi for the appellants. Mr.V.B.Rajure for Respondent No.5. None for respondent Nos.1 to 4. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 4th April 2005. DATED : 4th April 2005. DATED : 4th April 2005. ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER
Heard Mr.Dalvi for the appellants/Bank. This appeal is filed by the bank. Even though there was a decree in favour of the bank, the only thing that is challenged is that the trial court awarded interest only on the principal amount. According to Mr.Dalvi when on the date of suit the principal amount along with the 2 2 2 interest was Rs.3,24,285.62 ps, then that become the principal amount and not Rs.1,99,000/-. He relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal is partly allowed
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 04 Apr 2005. The bench was D G DESHPANDE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.