Executive Engineer v. Abhijit Ashok Surve & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. I see no reason to deviate in the approach to this Application, and in fact, this Court must be consistent in its approach across all Applications for condonation of delay. Consequently, this Application for condonation of delay is rejected for the very same reasons…
Judgment
Ms. Kajal Gupta, a/w Shweta Singh, i/b M.V. Kini & Co., for the Applicant. Appearance not received for Respondents. CORAM : SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J. DATE : JULY 21, 2025 ORDER :
#1. Having examined the Application seeking condonation of delay and the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of the Respondents, it is evident that the decision taken on February 5, 2025 in Executive Engineer National Highway Division vs. Sanjay Shankar Surve & Ors. (Arbitration Appeal (L) No.8703 of 2024) would squarely cover this Application as well. ASHWINI JANARDAN VALLAKATI Digitally signed by ASHWINI JANARDAN VALLAKATI 17:23:49 +0530 Ashwini Vallakati July 21, 2025
#2. In the judgement dated February 5, 2025 a reference was drawn to the decision of the Supreme Court in Borse Brothers1 as well as Postmaster General2 and it was pointed out that the grounds set out in the Application being, flimsy and vague, do not lend themselves to acceptance.
#3. I see no reason to deviate in the approach to this Application, and in fact, this Court must be consistent in its approach across all Applications for condonation of delay. Consequently, this Application for condonation of delay is rejected for the very same reasons as set out in the decision in Arbitration Appeal (L) No.8703 of 2024. Since the delay is not being condoned, the Petition cannot be entertained.
#4. All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court’s website. [ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] Executive Engineer v. Borse Brothers Engineers and Contractors Private 1 Limited – (2021) 6 SCC 460 2 Postmaster General v. Living Media (India) Ltd. – (2012) 3 SCC 563 Ashwini Vallakati July 21, 2025
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.