Judgment · High Court · 2005
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
FIRST APPEAL NO.1079 OF 1999 FIRST APPEAL NO.1078 OF 1999 WITH --------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders. : --------------------------------------------------------- : : : : Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr. M.G. Barve for the appellants in all matters. None for the respondents. CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. CORAM: CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. DATED: 20TH JANUARY, 2005 20TH JANUARY, 2005. DATED: DATED: 20TH JANUARY, 2005 P.C.:- The learned counsel appellants states amount Rs.25,000/- deposited . appeals section 173(1) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Rule 12-A Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules,
1960. Admittedly, appeals finally disposed of. The learned counsel appellants, therefore, liberty withdraw amounts. Hence, appellants permitted to withdraw the said amounts.
(SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 20 Jan 2005. The bench was RANJANA DESAI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.