APPLN 1348-2010 v. Bharti Haribhau Pisal & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 504
- Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 s. 3(1)(x)
Judgment
July, 2006 for which the first informant and her brother were prosecuted for setting house of accused on fire. The learned Judge has also observed that the report of the incident was given on 20th August, 2006 when the incident took place on 15th August, 2006. He has also noticed some discrepancies in the evidence of the witnesses about the manner in which the victim was allegedly assaulted or abused. Considering this, it cannot be said that view taken by the learned Judge is perverse or untenable calling for interference by this Court. Leave refused. Appeal is dismissed.
(R.C.CHAVAN, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.