Interim Application No. 950 of 2026 · Bombay High Court · 2026
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Interim application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Rushi 1 of 2
Judgment
Adv. Pravin Jadhav a/w P. Chavan for the applicant. Mr. N.C. Walimbe, AGP a/w Santosh Jadhav, B Panel Counsel, for the respondent – State. ___________ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 24 AUGUST 2026 P. C. :
#1. The interim application no. 950 of 2026 has been filed to bring on record the Legal Representatives of deceased Petitioner No. 2. There is a delay in filing this application.
#2. Heard counsel for both sides and we have gone through the contents of the interim application. We are satisfied that a ground is made out to allow this application.
#3. Interim application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Rushi 1 of 2
#4. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.] [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.] 2 of 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.