SMT. SARASWATI @ KALA v. MR. PUNDALIK RAMNATH PAI & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Counsel, both these appeals are dismissed as infructuous
Judgment
Operative part
SMT. SARASWATI @ KALA KASHINATH POI & ANR. Versus ..... APPELLANTS MR. PUNDALIK RAMNATH PAI & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Shri J.E. Coelho Pereira, Sr. Advocate with Shri V. Korgaonkar for the Appellants. Ms. G. Kale, Advocate for the Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.59/2000 MR. GIRISH A. KENI & ANR. .... APPELLANTS Versus SMT. SARASWATI @ KALA KASHINATH PAI & ANR. ..... RESPONDENTS Shri M.B. D'Costa, Sr. Adv. with Shri J.A. Lobo Advocate for the Appellants. Shri J.E. Coelho Pereira, Sr. Advocate with Shri V. Korgaonkar for the Appellants. Coram : A. P. LAVANDE, J . P.C.: Date : 13/04/2006 The Ld. Counsel appearing for the parties submit that the dispute between the parties has been already settled and as such 2 nothing remains in these appeals. In view of the statement made by the Ld. Counsel, both these appeals are dismissed as infructuous. Parties to bear their own costs. A.P. LAVANDE, J. NH
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Counsel, both these appeals are dismissed as infructuous
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 13 Apr 2006. The bench was A P LAVANDE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.