SHRI EVARISTO J.M. DE AZAVEDO, PANAJI GOA v. STATE OF GOA & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
civil application is allowed to be withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Arbitration Act, 1940 s. 30
Judgment
Operative part
SHRI EVARISTO J.M. DE AZAVEDO, PANAJI GOA. ....Applicant Versus STATE OF GOA AND ANR., ....Respondents Shri V. K. Bodke, Advocate for the applicant. Shri H. R. Bharne, Government Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 23rd September, 2005 P.C. Mr. V.K. Bodke, the learned Counsel for the applicant prays for withdrawal of this misc. civil application since the applicant has already made an application under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 before the District Judge, South Goa, Margao raising objections to the Award passed by the Arbitrator on 12.7.2004. The misc. civil application is allowed to be withdrawn. The District Judge, Margao is expected to hear and decide the application made by the applicant under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 expeditiously and preferably within four months from the receipt of this order. ssm. R. M. LODHA, J.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: civil application is allowed to be withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration Act, 1940 — s. 30.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 23 Sep 2005. The bench was R M LODHA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.