✦ Bombay High Court · 31 Mar 2010

PURSHOTTAM YESHWANT FAL DESSAI v. SHRI. RAMAKANT PAINGUINKAR

MISC.CIVIL Application No. 311 of 2009N A BRITTO

Case at a glance

Decided
31 Mar 2010
Bench
N A BRITTO

Judgment

PURSHOTTAM YESHWANT FAL DESSAI (DECEASED) AND ANR., Versus SHRI. RAMAKANT PAINGUINKAR ... Applicants ... Respondent Shri Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Applicants. Shri Shivan Dessai, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 31st March, 2010 P.C.:- Heard Shri Sudesh Usgaonkar and Shri Shivan Dessai, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of both parties. Shri Dessai, the learned Counsel has no objection for bringing Appellant No.1(a) on record. Application dated 6-3-2009 is granted. Let cause title be corrected showing Respondent No.1(a) in place of deceased Appellant No.1. Shri Usgaonkar, the learned Counsel assures the Court that he will file the Vakalatnama on his behalf. Application

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. MISC.CIVIL Application No. 311 of 2009). ← Search more judgments