Bharati Cellular Ltd v. Mr.Purushottam Dulapkar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Bharati Cellular Ltd., A Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Qutab Ambience, H-5/12, Mehrauli Road, New Delhi, 110 030 and having its Circle office at Vega Centre, D-Building, Shankarseth Road, Near Income Tax Office, Pune and Branch office at Second Floor, Mathiaz Plaza, 18th June Road, Panaji – Goa, represented herein through its Regional Business Manager, Goa, Shri Vishwanath Iyer. … Appellant. V/s.
1. Mr.Purushottam Dulapkar , r/o. Dulapi, Corlim – Goa.
2. Mrs. Emmy Caitan Po., r/o. Bella Vista, Near Corlim Church, Corlim, Goa.
3. The Villagers of Corlim, through Defendants No.1 and 2. … Respondents. Mr. Y. U. Nadkarni, Learned Advocate for the Appellant. 2 CORAM : A. H. JOSHI,. J. DATE : 1st September, 2009.
O R D E R :
In the suit filed in 2004 plaintiff's application for temporary injunction was rejected, ad mandatory injunction was ordered against plaintiff.
Appeal was admitted, and this Court has granted ex-parte stay of injunction by Order dated 13.1.2005 with notice of show cause.
Respondents have preferred to acquiesce with the Order. In view of this fact alone, by continuing stay Order granted by this Court till disposal of suit, the Appeal from Order No.1/2005 can be disposed as partly allowed.
Appeal from Order Nos. 10 and 11 of 2005 are disposed as not pressed.
No costs. A. H. JOSHI. ah/-
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Companies Act, 2013.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 01 Sep 2009.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.