Maria S v. The State of Goa, thr. the Chief Secretary
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
purpose, the Petition is disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accepting the aforesaid statement since the Petition has served its purpose, the Petition is disposed of. NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J. Signed by: MARIA SUZANA REBELLO Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 26/03/2025 21:14:25 24th March 2025
Judgment
The Petition is filed raising objection to the illegal construction in the form of RCC construction in the property bearing Survey No.4/1 of Village Chicolna, Bogmalo belonging to the Communidade of Chicolna
and being aggrieved by the inaction of the Respondent No.5 to compley with the directions issued by the Collector. 24th March 2025
The learned Counsel representing Respondent No.5 and 6 has 58-wp-227-2024 placed before us a Notice issued to several individuals in exercise of powers conferred by Article 371(2) read with Article 372 of the Code of Communidade notifying them to vacate the land immediately upon receipt of the Show Cause Notice and also indicating that if the structure is not removed within the specified period, it shall be removed at the expense of the individuals.
The learned Counsel categorically make a statement that the Notice issued by the Administrator of Communidade, South Goa, Margao, will be taken to its logical end within a period of eight weeks from today.
Operative part
Accepting the aforesaid statement since the Petition has served its purpose, the Petition is disposed of. NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J. Signed by: MARIA SUZANA REBELLO Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 26/03/2025 21:14:25 24th March 2025
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: purpose, the Petition is disposed of
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 24 Mar 2025. The bench was NIVEDITA P MEHTA, BHARATI H DANGRE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.