Writ Petition No. 320 of 1999 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. When the matter is called out, none is present for the Petitioners. In the light of that, Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Rule discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. REBELLO,J. F.I. REBELLO,J. F.I.F.I. REBELLO,J. HARDAS,J. P.V. HARDAS,J. P.V.P.V. HARDAS,J. ac.
Judgment
Mr. M.D.Salkar, Advocate, for the Petitioner. Mr. H.D. Naik, Addl. Govt. Advocate, for the Respondent No.1. ----- : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & HARDAS,JJ. P.V. HARDAS,JJ. P.V.P.V. HARDAS,JJ. DATED : JUNE 18, 2003. F.I. REBELLO,J.) ORAL JUDGMENT (PER F.I. REBELLO,J.) F.I. REBELLO,J.) Advocate on record has filed Notice dated 5-3-2003 addressed to Commercial Corporation of India Ltd. with A/D, whereby they intimated to the - 2 - Petitioners that they would be withdrawing in the matter and to make alternate arrangements.
Operative part
When the matter is called out, none is present for the Petitioners. In the light of that, Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Rule discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. REBELLO,J. F.I. REBELLO,J. F.I.F.I. REBELLO,J. HARDAS,J. P.V. HARDAS,J. P.V.P.V. HARDAS,J. ac.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Companies Act, 2013.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 18 Jun 2003. The bench was HARDAS, P V HARDAS, P V P V HARDAS, F I REBELLO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.