Criminal Application No. 1896 of 2010 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Criminal Application is disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. R.L.Khapre, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. A.R.Taywade, A.P.P. for Respondent/State. CORAM : Prasanna B. Varale, J. st Decem DATED : 01 . , 2010 Heard. Mr. Khapre, learned Advocate for the applicant fairly submits that the applicant has directly approached to this Court under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail as he is apprehending his arrest, without approaching the Sessions Court. He further submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present application so as to approach the Sessions Court. Learned Advocate for the applicant further submits that as ad-interim protection was granted to the applicant in Criminal Application No. 1700/2010, the applicant may be protected in the present application for a period of one week so as to approach the Sessions Court. In the circumstances, the applicant not to be arrested for a period of one week only from today in connection with Crime No. 352/2010 registered with Police Station, Washim so as to enable him to approach the Sessions Court. Criminal Application is disposed of. Steno copy of the order be given to the applicant on request. Diwale JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Criminal Application is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.