Judgment · High Court · 2011
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.571/2011 [Devendra Nagorao Gadge .vrs. State of Maharashtra] ................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... Shri Anup Dhore, Advocate for applicant, Shri Khubalkar, APP for respondent. .......... CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATE : DECEMBER 05, 2011. Heard. Present application is preferred for challenging order passed by the Court of Sessions refusing to discharge the applicant. It is submitted that considering the nature of order passed, the applicant ought to have invoked the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks the liberty to withdraw the present proceeding for filing appropriate proceeding. Liberty being sought at an early stage, the same deserves to be granted. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to prefer appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. JUDGE Gulande
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 05 Dec 2011. The bench was P D KODE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.