✦ Bombay High Court

Shri Vinod Damodar Sawarkar v. Harshal Kumaar Chiplunkar ) Office Notes, Office Memorandum of C & Ors.

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 1294 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5514 OF 2024 ( Shri Vinod Damodar Sawarkar vs. Smt. Harshal Kumaar Chiplunkar and others ) Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or the directions, and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's order Mr. Apurv De, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. A.G.Mate, AGP for respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. OCTOBER 09, 2025 1) By this application the applicant/petitioner is seeking service on the respondent No.1 either through e-mail or paper publication in addition to regular mode of service. 2) Considering the averments made in the application, same is allowed. The applicant to bear the expenses and duly provide the name of the news-paper which is widely circulated where respondent No.1 resides. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 5514 of 2024). ← Search more judgments