✦ Bombay High Court · 28 Nov 2007

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR v. Office Notes, Office Memoranda

Civil Revision Application No. 84 of 2007A H JOSHI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Revision Application is disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. In view of this, Civil Revision Application is disposed of. Sbm JUDGE

Judgment

Shri J. T. Gilda, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram: A. H. JOSHI, J. Dated: 28th November 2007.

1.

Learned Advocate for the petitioner does not press the Revision Application as he wants leave to amend the Writ Petition so as to incorporate Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the petition and pay Court fees.

3.

Leave as prayed for is granted. Consequential amendment be carried out in the Writ Petition within one week.

4.

Deficit Court fee be paid 2 within one week.

Operative part

5.

In view of this, Civil Revision Application is disposed of. Sbm JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Revision Application is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 28 Nov 2007. The bench was A H JOSHI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Revision Application No. 84 of 2007). ← Search more judgments