Writ Petition No. 4179 of 2006 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
Operative part
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4179 OF 2006 (Smt. Shantabai wd/o Dr. Pundlik Raut .v. Smt. Meena Ramesh Potbhare and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : R.V. MORE, J. 29TH NOVEMBER, 2007 Heard Shri N.K. Deshpande, the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner wants to intervene in Regular Civil Suit No. 36/1999 filed by the respondent No.1 against respondent Nos.2 and 3 for specific performance of an agreement. The suit is at the stage of evidence. It is well settled that in a suit for specific performance, a stranger to the agreement cannot be joined as a party defendant. In this view of the matter, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order in my jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition is dismissed. Needless to mention that the petitioner is at liberty raise an appropriate objection at the stage of execution in accordance with law. JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.